Tag | Ind | Content |
001 | ## | 0002-8565 |
016 | ## | \a22135 |
020 | ## | \a9780691192185 |
050 | ## | \aJN96.A69 \b.R67 2021 |
100 | 1# | \aRosenfeld, Bryn, \d1981- |
245 | 10 | \aThe Autocratic Middle Class : \bHow State Dependency Reduces the Demand for Democracy / \cBryn Rosenfeld |
260 | ## | \aPrinceton : \bPrinceton University Press, \c2021 |
300 | ## | \ax, 277 pages : \billustrations ; \c24 cm. |
490 | 0# | \aPrinceton studies in political behavior. |
504 | ## | \aIncludes bibliographical references and index. |
505 | 0# | \aThe autocratic middle class -- State dependence and middle class demand for democracy -- The post-communist middle classes, the state, and democratization -- Rethinking the middle class protest paradigm -- Choosing to work for the state -- Revolution, democratic retrenchment, and the middle class -- Aligning the middle class with autocracy : rhetoric and practice -- Conclusion |
520 | ## | \a"The conventional wisdom is that a growing middle class will give rise to democracy. Yet the middle classes of the developing world have grown at a remarkable pace over the past two decades, and much of this growth has taken place in countries that remain nondemocratic. Rosenfeld explains this phenomenon by showing how modern autocracies secure support from key middle-class constituencies. Drawing on original surveys, interviews, archival documents, and secondary sources collected from nine months in the field, she compares the experiences of recent post-communist countries, including Russia, the Ukraine, and Kazakhstan, to show that under autocracy, state efforts weaken support for democracy, especially among the middle class. When autocratic states engage extensively in their economies - by offering state employment, offering perks to those to those who are loyal, and threatening dismissal to those who are disloyal - the middle classes become dependent on the state for economic opportunities and career advancement, and, ultimately, do not support a shift toward democratization. Her argument explains why popular support for Ukraine's Orange Revolution unraveled or why Russians did not protest evidence of massive electoral fraud. The author's research questions the assumption that a rising share of educated, white-collar workers always makes the conditions for democracy more favorable, and why dependence on the state has such pernicious consequences for democratization"--\cProvided by publisher |
650 | #4 | \aCivil service \x Political activity \z Former communist countries \v Case studies. |
650 | #4 | \aMiddle class \x Political activity \z Former communist countries \v Case studies. |
650 | #4 | \aAuthoritarianism \z Former communist countries. |
650 | #4 | \aDemocracy \z Former communist countries. |
650 | #4 | \aDemocratization \z Former communist countries. |
651 | #4 | \aFormer communist countries \x Economic conditions. |
651 | #4 | \aFormer communist countries \x Politics and government. |
850 | ## | \aLIC |
999 | ## | \a2120005860 |