Page 42 - kpi15476
P. 42

การประชุมวิชาการ
                                                                                          สถาบันพระปกเกล้า ครั้งที่ 15   41


                      eternal, of universal scope, and could be taught and promoted successfully to
                      Buddhists and non-Buddhists both inside and outside the boundaries of his empire.
                      While apparently personally committed to Buddhism he did not regard it as having a
                      monopoly on the truth. Indeed, he warns against privileging one’s own faith over that
                      of others. In his 12  Rock Edict he writes ‘Whoever praises his own religion, due to
                                           th
                      excessive devotion, and condemns others with the thought “Let me glorify my own
                      religion,” only harms his own religion. Therefore contact (between religions) is good.’
                      For their part, those Westerners living on the borders of Ashoka’s empire were clearly
                      receptive enough to his ideas to arrange for paraphrases of the edicts to be made in
                      Greek. 6

                            But in what did Ashoka’s Dhamma consist? He himself answers this question in
                           nd
                      his 2  Pillar Edict. ‘Dhamma,’ he tells us, (involves) little evil, much good, kindness,
                      generosity, truthfulness and purity.’ He expands on this in Rock Edict 11, adding that
                      Dhamma consists in ‘proper behavior towards servants and employees, respect for
                      mother and father, generosity to friends, companions, relations, Brahmans and
                      ascetics, and not killing living beings.’ The edicts contain many references to social
                      policies such as on the welfare of prisoners, the treatment of animals, assistance to
                      the poor, and care for the sick and elderly. Ashoka speaks of his ‘Dhamma
                      regulations’ and ‘Dhamma proclamations’, and one has the sense that his edicts are
                      an attempt to articulate a universal code setting out the basic standards for a civilized
                      society.  He even employed civil servants known as Dhamma-mahamatras to proclaim
                      and enforce his principles of good government throughout the empire.



                      Ashokan values in the modern age


                            Coming forward in time, I see a connection here with our present location in the
                      UN conference centre in Bangkok, for a similar exercise was undertaken by the
                      United Nations when it formulated the Universal Declaration on Human Rights in
                      1948. This, and the many conventions that have since followed it, while more
                      extensive and precisely formulated, express the same values of tolerance and respect
                      for human dignity that we find in Ashoka’s edicts. There we see specific concern for
                      freedom of religion, peaceful coexistence among faiths, healthcare and social welfare,
                      prison reform, and social justice, and I believe we find similar values enshrined in the
                      UN Declaration. If I am correct in seeing a continuity between the concerns of
                      Ashoka’s Dhamma and the UN Declaration on Human Rights, it seems we have a way
                      of making a link between the policies of an ancient and revered Dhammaraja and the
                      principles that should underlie the governance of contemporary Western societies and,              เอกสารประกอบการอภิปรายร่วมระหว่างผู้แทนจากต่างประเทศ
                      indeed, of all member states of the United Nations.







                         6   David Sick. “When Socrates Met the Buddha: Greek and Indian Dialectic in Hellenistic Bactria
                      and India.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 17, no. 3 (2007): 253–278.
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47