Page 15 - kpiebook67013
P. 15

System of Political Parties. The dynamic emergence of political parties in Thailand have been
               a force in the development of Thai democracy and the country. Currently, almost all mainstream
               citizens do not trust them, except older men – with about half trusting them, with some expressing

               faith in the foundational institutions.



                      “I agreed with the (political party) system, but do not believe in politicians.”
                                                                               - Male, 40+, Northeast Region



                      Advantages of Parties. Some participants respect the party system for bringing together
               citizens with common ideals, providing access for people who want to participate in democracy,
               working together, developing good policies, and their methods of selecting candidates.



                      Weaknesses of Parties. However, to leverage the strength of a party, parties require their
               legislators to vote in a certain way, which can feel un-democratic. Political parties can shield their

               legislators, stripping away the citizens’ ability to hold their elected representative accountable.
               Citizens have seen the selfishness and unwillingness of parties to help other regions of the country

               – again, characteristics that are counter to traditional Thai values.


               SUMMARY TABLE OF THE RANGE OF COMMENTS ABOUT THE POLITICAL PARTY

               SYSTEM IN THAILAND



                 Like about Parties          Dislike about Parties


                 √  Gateway/access           √  Too many                       √  Selfishness and
                   to participate in         √  Party switching                  unwillingness to help
                   democracy                 √  Dishonesty (of some)             other parts of the country

                 √  Bring together citizens   √  System has divided            √  Expensive to be
                   with common ideals           the country                      competitive and lack of

                 √  Outreach to people       √  Not keeping campaign             financial controls allows
                 √  Sincere                     promises                         business interests of
                 √  Develop many good        √  Too focused on getting           senior leaders in some

                   policies and alternative     votes from segments              parties to have too much
                   ideas                     √  Rigid discipline (feels          power
                 √  Methods of selecting        undemocratic, counters         √  Nepotism

                   candidates                   wishes of home supporters,
                                                unaccountable)




                                                                                          FINDINGS     15
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20