Page 30 - kpiebook65020
P. 30

xvi


               answer before purposing a new law or amending a current one. OECD believes that the ten

               questions in the Checklist are not too complicated and suitable to be implemented in both
               developed and developing countries that aim to include RIA into the law-making process. In
               2017, OECD has accomplished its major goal when RIA has been adopted by all the 37 OECD

               members and it would not be an overstatement to claim that the global success of RIA
               implementation.

                       From a survey of RIA performance in various courtiers, despite being constrained by
               each objectives and other conditions, most countries tend to share six common steps to
               conduct  an  RIA;  (1)  identifying  problems,  (2)  identifying  objectives,  (3)  surveying  policy

               options,  (4)  assessing  each  policy  option,  (5)  comparing  policy  options,  and  (6)  ex-post

               assessment of the RIA result and process.
                       All in all, regulatory necessity assessment and Regulatory impact appraisal are vital
               tools for advancing quality of law because both tools require the government agency to


                 (4) Is there a legal basis for regulation? Regulatory processes should be structured so that all regulatory
               decisions rigorously respect the “rule of law”;that is, responsibility should be explicit for ensuring that all
               regulations are authorised by higher-level regulations and consistent with treaty obligations, and comply

               with relevant legal principles such as certainty, proportionality andapplicable procedural requirements.
                 (5) What is the appropriate level (or levels) of government for this action? Regulators should choose the
               most appropriate level of government to take action, or if multiple levels are involved, should design
               effective systems of co-ordination between levels of government.
                 (6) Do the benefits of regulation justify the costs? Regulators should estimate the total expected costs
               and benefits of each regulatory proposal and of feasible alternatives, and should make the estimates
               available in accessible format to decision-makers. The costs of
               government action should be justified by its benefits before action is taken.
                 (7) Is the distribution of effects across society transparent? To the extent that distributive and equity

               values are affected by government intervention, regulators should make transparent the distribution of
               regulatory costs and benefits across social groups.
                 (8) Is the regulation clear, consistent, comprehensible and accessible to users? Regulators should assess
               whether rules will be understood by likely users, and to that end should take steps to ensure that the
               text and structure of rules are as clear as possible.
                 (9)  Have  all  interested  parties  had  the  opportunity  to  present  their  views?  Regulations  should  be

               developed in an open and transparent fashion, with appropriate procedures for effective and timely input
               from interested parties such as affected businesses and trade unions, other interest groups, or other
               levels of government.
                 (10) How will compliance be achieved? Regulators should assess the incentives and institutions through
               which  through  which  the  regulation  will  take  effect,  and  should  design  responsive  implementation
               strategies that make the best use of them.
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35