Page 79 - kpi18886
P. 79

71




                   (NS). This Strategy “...must cover at least a period of 20 years and be
                   subject to a review every 5 years to be lined within the global or
                   national situations.” It is intended to allow for adjustment: “If and when
                   there occurs any global change of the global situation and if such
                   change has adversely affected the major purposes of the NS, a review
                   of the NS can be made with approval of the Parliament.” However, the
                   related National Strategy Draft Bill also states that “The National
                   Strategy binds all government agencies and officials legally. Those failing
                   to accomplish the set goals or follow the plans will be subject to
                   examination by the National Anti-Corruption Commission.”


                         The intent and need is clear; the practical implications of
                   implementation at this stage less so. It is not clear at this stage how
                   flexible the above policy process is likely to be in practice, particularly
                   with the inevitable emergence over time of differing and vested
                   interests for and against particular elements of a 20-year strategy. As
                   noted earlier, the distribution of the gains of economic growth
                   (economic surpluses), as well as the allocation of losses, is the normal
                   business of politics through debate, negotiation, and compromise. It is
                   not clear how different interests over such distributions, and over the
                   direction of economic policy, will be reconciled within Thailand’s
                   proposed policy framework. There is also concern that the approach
                   being taken may lead to technocratic interests appropriating or
                   dominating what should be the legitimate, if complex, difficult and
                   uncertain interactive political process.

                   Conclusion


                         The Thai case illustrates the fundamental political economy
                   challenge facing Asian emerging economies, particularly in Southeast
                   Asia. How to implement successfully the long-term economic
                   transformation necessary to address stalled growth and the middle-
                   income trap; and at the same time, also uphold a liberal democratic
                   political system that ensures political, economic, and civil rights. Policy
                   stability is needed for essential if uncertain economic change; but a





                                                                             ปาฐกถานำ
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84