Page 25 - kpiebook65010

แนวทางและวิธีการวิเคราะห์
ผลกระทบทางสังคมในการตรากฎหมาย

๏ Cost-benefit analysis is the most popular method for assessing
quantitative impact. However, some others, which include cost-

effectiveness analysis and multi-criteria analysis, can be used in light of
the appropriateness of the information types.

Lessons learnt from other jurisdictions for the application in
Thailand (Chapter 5)

Key findings from Chapter 5 can be summarized into two respects:

comparative discussions and case studies in the Thai context.

The first presents the outcomes from a comparative study between the RIA
regime in Thailand and those in other jurisdictions. This comparison seeks to

identify what Thailand can learn from experiences from other countries and adapt
to the Thai context. Chapter 5, then, discusses thirteen points, as seen below.

1) Are there any laws or regulations providing specific approaches and
methods for RIA analysis?

2) What kind of proposals are under the assessment of the RIA regime in
each jurisdiction?

3) Are there any criteria or processes for screening the proposals under RIA

analysis?

4) Are there any rules for characterizing types and scope of impacts under

the impact assessment regimes?

5) Are there any detailed provisions ruling specific types of the impact
assessment process?

6) Are there any provisions stipulated self-standing rules for social impact
assessment?

7) Is a quantitative analysis required as the default rule for RIA analysis?

สถาบันพระปกเกล้า

13