Page 26 - kpiebook65010

แนวทางและวิธีการวิเคราะห์
ผลกระทบทางสังคมในการตรากฎหมาย

8) Are there any analysis techniques set as a default rule for RIA analysis?

9) Are there any mandatory considerations set for RIA analysis?

10) Is the analysis of the burden of compliance required for RIA?

11) Are there any sanctions set for non-compliance with RIA analysis?

12) Are there any other observations worth noting for each jurisdiction?

The study of assessment approaches and methods implemented in the EU

and the four countries and the discussions of thirteen points mentioned above
leads to the conclusion that there is room for Thailand to learn and further
develop RIA analysis approaches and methods. Some research findings for the

development can be noted as follows.

Concerning the approaches, it can be exemplified that the guidance for

identifying and analyzing viable options that achieve the objectives should be
further developed and required in an RIA report. Additionally, as implemented in

the EU countries, the principle of proportionate analysis should also be adopted
for RIA processes for Thailand. Above all, there should be the rule requiring a
quantitative approach as a primary approach for RIA analysis.

The research findings suggest that the guidelines detailing the primary
technique to be employed for RIA analysis should be provided regarding analysis

methods. They include cost-benefit analysis (CBA), cost-effectiveness analysis
(CEA), and multi-criteria analysis.

The last part of the study provides three cases study illustrating how RIA

reports in Thailand can be more trustworthy and comprehensive. The cases are
part of law drafts submitted by responsible public agencies. The first case study is

the RIA attached to the law draft to promote standards of sports coaches and
sports referees. The second is that for the law draft for the promotion of taking
advantage of research and innovation. The last one is that for amending factory

law respectively.

สถาบันพระปกเกล้า

14