Page 65 - kpi20756

การประชุมวิชาการ
สถาบันพระปกเกล้า ครั้งที่ 21
ลดช่องว่างความเหลื่อมล้ำ สร้างคุณภาพประชาธิปไตย

Table 2 Effects of Income Position on Regime Support: Unequal Countries
Table２Effects of Income Position on Regime Support: Unequal Countries
Democracy Inclusive Checks and Dictatorship
citizenship balances
Income quintile
Second .054* -.047* -.003 -.032
Third .046 -.018 -.015 -.067*
Fourth .045 -.013 .027 -.093**
Fifth .078* -.055 .106** -.135***
Female -.020 .042** -.026 .061**
Age (years) .004*** .001 .003*** -.003***
Education (years) .000 .009*** .019*** -.018***

R-square .008 .005 .012 .017
(N) (5978) (6373) (5939) (6155)
Entries are unstandardized regression coefficients.
Entries are unstandardized regression coefficients.
*** P<.001 ** P<.01 * P<.05
*** P<.001 ** P<.01 * P<.05
Source: 2014-16 ABS IV
Source: 2014-16 ABS IV

Table 3 Effects of Income Position on Regime Support: Equal Countries
Table３Effects of Income Position on Regime Support: Equal Countries
Democracy Inclusive Checks and Dictatorship
citizenship balances
Income quintile
Second -.020 .008 -.030 -.040
Third .002 -.048 -.013 -.004
Fourth .041 -.049 .047 -.021
Fifth .102* .016 .064 -.039
Female .021 .053*** -.042 -.031
Age (years) .007*** .001 .005*** -.002**
Education (years) .038*** .018*** .036*** -.025***

R-square .050 .018 .028 .026
(N) (3270) (3377) (3179) (3319)
Entries are unstandardized regression coefficients.
*** P<.001 ** P<.01 * P<.05
Entries are unstandardized regression coefficients.
Source: 2014-16 ABS IV
*** P<.001 ** P<.01 * P<.05
Source: 2014-16 ABS IV

Second, Table 3 shows evidence from equal countries with the Gini
coefficient below 35.0. The theories of political economy linking inequality to

democracy examined here all expect that the wealthy are no different from the
poor in support for democracy or opposition to dictatorship because of low เอกสารประกอบการอภิปรายร่วมระหว่างผู้แทนจากต่างประเทศ

distributional conflict there. As presented in the table, falling in the richest
quintile instead of the poorest one had positive effects only on democracy in
16
general. Yet, falling in the richest quintile instead of the poorest one had no

17