Page 66 - kpi20756
P. 66

การประชุมวิชาการ
                    สถาบันพระปกเกล้า ครั้งที่ 21
            ลดช่องว่างความเหลื่อมล้ำ สร้างคุณภาพประชาธิปไตย




                     effects on inclusive citizenship and checks and balances as well as dictatorship.
                     In countries with low income inequality, the wealthy were no different from the

                     poor in support for institutions of democracy and opposition to authoritarian rule.
                     Notice that our cases of lower income equality are all high-income countries,

                     suggesting the influence of economic growth with declining income disparity, as
                     captured by the Kuznets curve. Of the socio-demographic characteristics, age
                     had positive effects on democracy in general and checks and balances while it

                     had negative effects on dictatorship. As expected, gender had positive effects
                     only on inclusive citizenship. More notable is that education had positive effects

                     not only on democracy in general but also on inclusive citizenship and checks
                     and balances while it had negative effects on dictatorship. In countries with low
                     income inequality where distributional conflicts are less salient, values and

                     beliefs, as captured especially by education, seem to play a larger role in
                     shaping attitudes towards political regime.


                     Table 4 Effects of Income Position on Regime Support
                 Table 4 Effects of Income Position on Regime Support
                                                Democracy       Inclusive     Checks and      Dictatorship
                                                               citizenship     balances
                 Income quintile
                   Second                          .039*         -.021           -.002            -.029
                   Third                           .041*         -.020           -.006           -.044*
                   Fourth                         .060**         -.022           .045            -.069**
                   Fifth                          .114***        -.017           .104**         -.096***
                 Female                            -.009        .043***          -.034*           .029*
                 Age (years)                      .005***         .001          .004***         -.003***
                 Education (years)                .010***       -.013***        .025***         -.017***
                 Country characteristics
                   Unequal and high-income         .045         -.133***        -.167***        -.217***
                   Equal and high-income           -.015        .219***         .219***         -.406***
        เอกสารประกอบการอภิปรายร่วมระหว่างผู้แทนจากต่างประเทศ

                 R-square                          .014           .057           .057             .115
                 (N)                              (9248)         (9750)         (9118)           (9474)
                 Entries are unstandardized regression coefficients.
                 *** P<.001 ** P<.01 * P<.05
                     Entries are unstandardized regression coefficients.
                 Source: 2014-16 ABS IV
                     *** P<.001 ** P<.01 * P<.05
                     Source: 2014-16 ABS IV




                           Finally, Table 4 shows evidence from the sample countries without dividing
                     them into two groups by levels of income inequality. Two country-level dummy
                     variables, as constructed by combining national income and income inequality,

































                                                              18
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71